2001
Ocular Microbiology and Immunology Group, Abstract 14
OMIG
Main Page | 2001 Abstracts| <
Previous | Next>
Fourth
Generation Fluoroquinolones: New Weapons in the Arsenal of Ophthalmic
Antibiotics
R. Mather, R.P. Kowalski, L.M. Karenchak, E.G. Romanowski, F.S.
Mah and J.S. Gordon
The Campbell Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Purpose:
We compared the in vitro susceptibility of fourth generation fluoroquinolones
(FQs) (moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin) to second generation FQs (ciprofloxacin
and ofloxacin) and a third generation FQ (levofloxacin).
Methods:
The MICs (µ/ml) of 98 bacterial endophthalmitis isolates
were determined to MOX, GAT, OFX and LEV using Etests. The median
MICs were compared nonparametrically using Kruskal-Wallis with Duncan's
comparisons.
Results:
In general, the order of significant susceptibility for gram positive
bacteria was MOX>GAT>CIP= LEV>OFX. The order of significant
susceptibility for second generation FQ resistant S.aureus
was MOX>GAT>LEV>CIP=OFX. The order of significant susceptibility
for second generation FQ resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus
was MOX=GAT>LEV=CIP=OFX. For gram negative bacteria, the order
of significant susceptibility was MOX=GAT=CIP=LEV>OFX.
Conclusions:
Our in vitro study suggests that the fourth generation FQs are more
potent than the second and third generation FQs for gram positive
bacteria and equally as potent for gram negative bacteria. The fourth
generation FQs appear to cover second and third generation FQ resistance.
In vivo studies will be necessary to correlate our
in vitro results.
OMIG
Main Page | 2001 Abstracts| <
Previous | Next>
|